Supreme Court came down heavily on two members of NCLAT who were issued contempt notice for defying an order of the apex court
Published Date – 02:22 PM, Mon – 30 October 23
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday came down heavily on two members of NCLAT who were issued contempt notice for defying an order of the apex court.
After going through the relevant CCTV footage of the NCLAT proceedings from October 13, a bench headed by CJI D.Y. Chandrachud and comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra said that there exists a ‘clear intention’ to breach the directions passed by the Supreme Court.
In view of the unconditional apology tendered by Member (Technical) Dr Alok Srivastava, the bench decided to put an end to contempt proceedings. During the hearing, the top court was apprised by senior advocate P.S. Patwalia that Member (Judicial) Rakesh Kumar — who was part of the contentious bench of NCLAT — has tendered his resignation to the Chairman of the appellate tribunal. Senior advocate Patwalia, who represented Member (Judicial) Rakesh Kumar, said that members of the bench had no intention to defy the orders passed by the apex court and there is no affront or ego involved.
At this, CJI D.Y. Chandrachud said: “There is no denial of the fact that the lawyers did point out (before NCLAT bench) that an order was passed by the Supreme Court.” In its order, the apex court directed Deepak Chhabria and the scrutiniser to deposit costs of Rs 1 crore and Rs 10 lakh, respectively, in the Prime Minister Relief Fund for misusing the process of law.
Earlier on October 18, the Supreme Court had issued contempt notice to two members for ‘wilfully’ defying directions passed by it. The top court had also set aside the judgment passed by the two-member bench of the NCLAT saying that parties cannot take recourse to ‘devious’ means to obviate compliance with the orders passed by the Supreme Court.
On October 13, the top court ordered the Chairperson of the NCLAT to conduct an inquiry into the working of a bench of the appellate tribunal which allegedly defied an order of the Supreme Court. It had said that it is passing the order in “extraordinary circumstances” where the two-member bench of the NCLAT proceeded to pronounce the judgment despite the clear mandate of the order passed by the Supreme Court asking the appellate tribunal to declare “its judgment in the pending appeal after it is duly apprised of the fact that the result of the Annual General Meeting has been declared”.
Senior advocates Abhishek Manu Singhvi and N.K. Kaul had apprised the top court that the bench consisting of Rakesh Kumar and Dr Alok Srivastava of the NCLAT proceeded to deliver the order despite request made by the petitioner before the appellate tribunal to not deliver the judgment until the report of the scrutiniser is made available.
“If what is stated is correct, this will clearly constitute the defiance of the order of this court by the NCLAT,” the Supreme Court had said, noting that its order was uploaded at 1.55 p.m. while the scrutiniser’s report was stated to be uploaded at 2.40 p.m.
