Health warning issued over flesh-eating ulcer in Australia

On Friday, the Department of Health in Victoria announced that cases of Buruli ulcer are increasing across the state, including in inner Melbourne, according to Xinhua news agency. Buruli ulcer is a bacterial infection believed to be transmitted from possums to humans through mosquito bites. The infection typically starts as a painless lump or wound that can gradually evolve into a severe ulcer.

Updated On – 21 December 2024, 04:32 PM


Health warning issued over flesh-eating ulcer in Australia

Representational Image

Sydney: Health authorities in Australia’s second-most populous state have issued a warning over the spread of a flesh-eating ulcer.

The Department of Health in Victoria on Friday said that cases of Buruli ulcer are spreading across the state, including in inner Melbourne, Xinhua news agency reported.


Buruli ulcer is a bacterial infection that researchers believe is spread from possums to humans by mosquitoes. Cases initially present as a painless lump or wound that can slowly develop into a destructive ulcer.

If left untreated, the flesh-eating ulcer can lead to permanent disfigurement and long-term disability.

The Department of Health’s warning said that the highest risk of infection occurs during warmer months but that it can take four to five months for an ulcer to develop.

As of December 17, there had been 344 confirmed Buruli ulcer infections in Victoria in 2024, the department said, compared to 362 at the same time in 2023, 338 in 2022, 286 in 2021 and 217 in 2020.

“Everyone is susceptible to infection. The disease can occur at any age, but Buruli ulcer notifications are highest in people aged 60 years and above in Victoria,” the health alert said.

Infection is not transmissible from person to person, but household members of a confirmed case in Victoria have been advised to monitor for symptoms as they may have been exposed to the same environmental source.

When recognised early, diagnostic testing is straightforward and treatment can significantly reduce skin loss and tissue damage, the Department of Health said.

Victoria’s 6.9 million people have been advised to take preventative measures by avoiding mosquito bites.

‘Fridays of Rage’: Iranians rally against Israeli atrocities, silence of supporters


Iranians in the southwestern city of Yasuj hold protests against the Israeli regime and its supporters on December 20, 2024. (By Shabestan news agency)

Iranians have rallied across several provinces, raging against the Israeli regime’s atrocities and the silence of its supporters.

The people of the provinces of Qom, Semnan, and Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad demonstrated in their provincial capitals following Friday prayers under the banner of “Fridays of Rage.”

They strongly condemned the regime’s crimes in the Gaza Strip, Lebanon, and Syria, shouting their anger towards Tel Aviv’s supporters over their silence in the face of its acts of bloodletting and sedition across the region.

The rallies came amid the regime’s 15-month-long war of genocide against Gaza that has so far claimed the lives of more than 45,200 Palestinians, mostly women and children.

Last month, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants against Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and ousted war minister Yoav Gallant after charging them with committing war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza during the war that has featured using starvation as a method of warfare.

In its verdict, the court said there were “reasonable grounds” to believe that both Gallant and Netanyahu “intentionally and knowingly” deprived Palestinians in Gaza of basic needs like food and water, adding that their actions geared towards destroying the conditions of life in the coastal sliver constituted crimes against humanity.

The demonstrations also followed 14 months of escalated deadly aggression by the regime against Lebanon that killed more than 4,000 people.

Tel Aviv is, meanwhile, constantly violating a ceasefire that came about last month to deadly effects on the Lebanese people.

The regime has additionally intensified its brutal attacks against Syria’s economic and defensive infrastructures since the country’s takeover by Western and Tel Aviv-backed anti-Damascus militants.


Press TV’s website can also be accessed at the following alternate addresses:

www.presstv.co.uk

Trump threatens to retake Panama Canal in Truth Social post

Trump accused Panama of “ripping off” American vessels by charging “exorbitant prices” to use the vital waterway that acts as a shortcut linking the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.

Without it, ships would be forced to sail a much farther distance around South America’s rocky Cape Horn.

Trump was referring to the 1977 treaty over the canal’s status, which transferred control of the canal from the U.S. to Panama at the end of the 20th century.

It was hailed as one of President Jimmy Carter’s greatest accomplishments, but Trump slammed the 39th president for “foolishly giving it away for one dollar.”

“Our Navy and Commerce have been treated in a very unfair and injudicious way,” Trump vented. “The fees being charged by Panama are ridiculous, especially knowing the extraordinary generosity that has been bestowed to Panama by the U.S.”

“If the principles, both moral and legal, of this magnanimous gesture of giving are not followed, then we will demand that the Panama Canal be returned to us, in full, and without question,” he stridently added.

Fees to pass through the canal range from as little as $0.50 to $300,000, depending on the size of the vessels.

It wasn’t immediately known what prompted Trump’s outburst about the canal.

America uses the canal more than any other country, followed by China and then Japan, figures show.

At the beginning of this year, drought forced authorities to slash ship crossings in the canal by 36 percent, impacting global trade routes.

MNA/

Putin sets condition for normalizing ties with US

“It is possible to do everything upon wish. We have never abandoned this wish,” the head of state said in an interview with VGTRK journalist Pavel Zarubin on Sunday, responding to a question about the possibility for Russia and the United States to normalize their relations. 

Everything changes in international relations and only interests remain invariable, in this case, “the interests of Russia and its people,” the Russian leader stressed.

“If we see that the situation changes in a way that there are opportunities and prospects for building relations with other countries, then we are ready for that. It is not a question of us but it’s a question of them. But this should be without detriment to interests of the Russian Federation,” Putin emphasized.

Speaking about changes in international relations, the Russian leader gave examples from the 19th and 20th centuries. In particular, he recalled that after the Crimea War of 1853-1856, when a series of restrictions were imposed on Russia, many wrote that it isolated itself and did not respond to injustices occurring in the world.

In response to that, as Putin went on to say, then-Foreign Minister of the Russian Empire Alexander Gorchakov sent out a letter with the following words: “Russia is not angry. Russia is concentrating.”

“Gradually, as Russia was concentrating, it returned all its rights in the Black Sea as well, grew stronger and so on,” the Russian leader said.

Putin also drew attention to the fact that some historians described the Crimea War as ‘World War Zero’ as practically all the European powers participated in it against Russia. However, as he went on to say, the situation changed and these same countries were already Russia’s allies during World War I.

“Everything changes and only interests remain invariable,” the Russian leader concluded.

MP/

Rewind: The Dutch Revolt for Rights of Man

The ‘Dutch Declaration of the Rights of Man’ envisaged that no power on earth should have the right to control the destinies of the people living in another country

Published Date – 21 December 2024, 09:28 PM


Rewind: The Dutch Revolt for Rights of Man


By KSS Seshan

Colonialism that emerged as a dominant international factor at the beginning of the modern period was the quintessence of authoritarianism, exploitation, imperialism and economic domination of a powerful nation leading to political and economic subjugation of another country. It worked on the premise that the ‘wealth of the nations’ if not exploited by the native country itself due to its inherent lack of skills, then there was every justification that another country with its resources, ability and strength could bring out the wealth of that country by subjugating it.


The forceful occupation of the underdeveloped Afro-Asian countries by several European powers after the 14th and 15th centuries for economic gain became the order of the day. Spain, Portugal, France and England were the major European powers that advocated colonialism and occupied several countries, thus becoming colonial powers. Countries in Asia, Africa and America thus were colonised by the European powers and became victims of exploitation.

Clamour for Independence
Colonialism had a setback after World War I when there was a resurgence of the marginalised Afro-Asian countries clamouring for independence from the colonial powers and won their independence from such bondage. However, a few like the 13 American colonies on the Atlantic seaboard became free as early as 1776 after a prolonged war with England. The rest had to wait for their freedom. India’s case though was different as it adopted a different path to win independence. Having understood after 1857 that the British were equipped with greater military prowess, India followed, by and large, a peaceful method that adhered to the twin principles of truth and non-violence and ultimately won its independence in 1947.

While every colony had its own tale of struggle, some served as models for others. One such was the Dutch War of Independence during the mid-16th century. It was directed against Spain, a strong colonial power at that time. The Dutch Declaration of the ‘Rights of Man’ proclaimed at the time of their independence in 1566 was the epitome of their war against colonialism and became a forerunner for many other revolutions the world over.

The revolt of the Netherlands was the greatest blow that Spain received during the rule of Philip II. Spain, which hitherto enjoyed economic leadership in Europe with an adage “if Spain moved, the entire Europe moved”, was weakened by the revolt and a new progressive Protestant state came into being in Europe. In the second half of the 16 century, the Netherlanders rose in revolt against Philip II. After a devastating struggle, the Protestant northern Dutch provinces proclaimed independence while the Catholic southern provinces decided to remain under the King of Spain.

Man-Made Country
The inhabitants of the Netherlands were hard-working and prosperous, successful in agriculture, commerce and industry. The Netherlands was originally 17 separate States which came under the possession of the King of Spain as early as 1477. Each State had its own constitution and to an extent, Charles V (1500- 1558) the Holy Roman Emperor, who also was the King of Spain, gave a better unified administration and the Dutch were happy. But his son, Philip II who succeeded his father in 1556, was arrogant, short-tempered and adopted an anti-Dutch stand. The States were very rich, and the cities and harbours such as Antwerp, Ghent, Bruges and Amsterdam generated a huge amount of revenue.

The literal meaning of the Netherlands is ‘Lowlands’ as it was below the sea level. The people, by constructing dykes and draining water, used the landmass that emerged for agriculture and industry. (The story of a Dutch schoolboy keeping his little finger in a leaking hole in the dyke all night till elders arrived in the morning and thus saving the dyke from its imminent breach is well known.) A Dutch saying aptly puts that “If God created man, man created the Netherlands.”

Spain, a Colonial Power
Philip II directed from Madrid all his administrative efforts. Spain collected huge amounts as taxes from its colony and the rich Dutch States paid their dues without any returns in the form of developmental activities. The entire administration was manned by Spanish personnel and Philip II disregarded the interests of the natives. With the wealth flowing from the Netherlands, Spain became one of the leading economic powerhouses and even challenged England that resulted in the grand fiasco of the Spanish Armada in the later part of the 16th century.

Religion was another major cause of the dissatisfaction of the Dutch people against the Spanish rule. Ever since the rise of Protestantism, the Dutch people increasingly became Protestants against the Catholic Spaniards. Philip II, a staunch Catholic, strictly enforced several edicts passed earlier to curb Protestantism and make his rule in the Netherlands a reality. He introduced the Inquisition, the religious courts, which roused great feelings of dissatisfaction among the people. Bishoprics were increased from 3 to 15. Since the Bishops were to be appointed by the crown, it was feared that they would act as king’s agents, and both Catholics and Protestants objected to this.

There was also a general dissatisfaction among the people against the absolute rule of a foreign dynasty. When several able leaders were locally available, Philip II appointed his sister, Margaret of Parma, as his Regent in the Netherlands.

 

The Many Firsts
Netherlanders were the first in the world to tap wind energy by making windmills. The Dutch also used peat as a source of energy. Cheap energy was the secret of their industrial growth.

• Preservation of fish was invented by a Dutchman and the Dutch became successful traders in fish by exporting barreled fish to other European countries. They were the first to fish whales. As eating meat was forbidden for 40 days before the Easter festival, the preserved Dutch fish became a favourite in Europe thus making the Netherlands rich through fish trade. It is said in a lighter vein that the foundations of Amsterdam were laid on the Erring bones. (Erring fish was a delicacy and favoured by European countries)

 

The Dutch War had very modest beginnings. In April 1566, about 400 Dutch nobles met at Brussels and presented a charter of demands to Margaret demanding that the Inquisition courts and harsh edicts be withdrawn and the peoples’ representative body, Estates General, be summoned at regular intervals. When she promised to look into their demands, a loyal follower impatiently said, “Is it possible that Your Highness is afraid of these beggars.” He used the word ‘Guex’ which means Beggars, sea beggars at that. When this derogatory remark reached the petitioners, they designated themselves as ‘Beggars’ and decided to fight for their rights. Protests and religious riots were held throughout the Netherlands against Spain.

To crush the Dutch revolt, Philip II sent a close confidant Duke of Alva as the head of the Spanish army. The Duke was given the powers of a dictator. Soon after arriving, he introduced a ‘Council of Troubles’—notoriously popular as the ‘Council of Blood’. It is said that about 18,000 Dutch people were put to death on trivial charges. Several Protestant leaders were put to death by the Inquisition courts. However, their executions only enabled others to oppose the Spanish rule tooth and nail. In 1569, Alva’s rule reached its climax when he imposed several unjust taxes. For example, he imposed a general 1% tax on all personal property; 5% on the sale of landed property and 10% on all movable goods. There were widespread riots against these taxes.

William the Silent
Like every major popular movement is propelled by a leader, the Dutch War of Independence also had its leader in William of Orange, popularly known as William the Silent. He had moved to Germany for fear of life during the reign of the Duke of Alva. On returning to the Netherlands, William collected men and money for the war against Spain. He had several successes against the Spanish army and became the Governor of (Stadtholder) Holland. Stunned, Philip II recalled the Duke and appointed in 1573 a moderate, Requesens, as the Regent. The new Regent abolished the ‘Council of Troubles’, removed Inquisition courts and withdrew the unpopular taxes. But Requesens suddenly died in 1576 before achieving any permanent solution to the Dutch unrest.

The leaderless Spanish troops looted cities like Antwerp and committed horrible atrocities. These acts only strengthened the unity of the Protestants and Catholics. William, taking advantage of the situation, brought all the 17 States together with a treaty, ‘Pacification of Ghent’, in 1576 to give a united fight for independence against Spain.

Birth of Two Nations
After the death of Requesens, Philip II sent a person of his household, Prince of Parma, as the Regent to the Netherlands. Parma was so able that soon after coming to the Netherlands, he brought a division in the Pacification of Ghent that William had earlier forged. Parma formed the Union of Arras (1579) with all the 10 southern Catholic States. The remaining seven northern Protestant provinces came under the ‘Union of Utrecht’. Thus the united Netherlands went its own ways on religious lines and was divided into two separate geographical units.

In 1581, the representatives of the northern States left their allegiance to the King of Spain and unilaterally declared their independence. The ‘Dutch Declaration of the Rights of Man’ issued by them became a sheet anchor against the very concept of colonialism and has influenced political thought since then. The Declaration envisaged that no power on earth should have the right to control the destinies of the people living in another country. It was a clear pronouncement against the policy of colonialism. The rebel Dutch nation came to be called Holland while the Catholic States that remained loyal to Spain were later known as Belgium.

Assassination of William I
William of Orange came from a modest ‘Orange’ family and, therefore, was known as William of Orange. He was also known as William the Silent for the unostentatious lifestyle he led. His unflinching patriotism and strong opposition to the exploitative Spanish colonial rule earned him a great following among both the Dutch people and nobles.

Philip II, believing that William was a great obstacle to the reconquest of Dutch provinces, announced a large amount of money, property and a title of nobility to anyone who would capture or kill the Dutch leader. In 1584, a young Burgundian, Balthazar, managed to enter the modest house of William in the town of Delft and shot him dead with a pistol. It is said that William had personally opened the door. William’s place was taken by his equally able son Prince Maurice who soon successfully drove the Spaniards out of Dutch provinces.

Finally in 1648, nearly seven decades after the unilateral declaration of independence, at the Treaty of Westphalia that brought curtains on the 30-year (1618-1648) war, the united Netherlands was recognised as a separate nation by Spain.

 KSS Seshan

(The author is a retired Professor of History at the University of Hyderabad)

 

King of England
The Netherlands hogged the limelight in European political affairs when William III became the King of England on 13 February 1689. William III married Mary, daughter of James II of England. When James II fled the country during the Glorious Revolution in 1688 (also called the Puritan or Bloodless Revolution), the English parliament unanimously invited William III to be the King along with Mary. It was the only time in the history of England when the throne was jointly held by both the King and the Queen.

During William III’s reign, the system of Cabinet’s collective responsibility had its origin. The Bank of England was established in 1694. William III also introduced several constitutional reforms. In foreign affairs, he opposed Louis XIV of France and successfully established English supremacy. The English hailed him as the ‘Hero who saved the country’. As William III and Mary had no children, Anne, Mary’s sister, succeeded to the throne. Since Anne too had no surviving child, the throne of England after her death in 1714 went to the Hanoverian dynasty that has continued ever since. The present king, Charles III, thus belongs to the Hanoverian dynasty.

 

Iran says own aircraft used for 'responsible' pullout from Syria

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei has said that the advisory presence of the Islamic Republic in Syria was aimed at supporting the Syrian army, combating terrorism, and preventing insecurity from spreading to the broader region.

“Iran’s advisory presence in Syria was initially aimed at supporting the Syrian army, combating terrorism, and preventing insecurity from spreading to neighboring areas and the broader region. The decision to withdraw advisory forces was also a responsible move, considering the prevailing conditions in Syria and the region,” Baghaei noted.

Recently, Russian President Vladimir Putin addressed questions regarding the developments in Syria during his annual press conference titled “Direct Line,” providing insights into the battlefield dynamics leading to President Bashar al-Assad’s fall, as well as the coordination between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Russian Federation.

Putin noted that Russia had no ground forces in Syria, stating, “We have two bases there (Syria)—an air force base and a naval base. The ground forces consist of Syria’s own military and, as is well known, certain Iran-aligned combat units. At one point, we even withdrew our special operations forces from the area. Our mission there was not solely about fighting.”

He also shared his account of the military developments in Syria, saying, “When opposition groups approached Aleppo, approximately 30,000 troops were defending the city. Around 350 militants entered the city. Syrian government forces, alongside Iranian-aligned units, retreated without resistance, detonating their positions as they withdrew. Except for isolated armed clashes, this was the general pattern across Syrian territory.”

He noted, “Previously, our Iranian allies would request assistance to deploy their forces into Syria. Now, they are asking for help to withdraw them. We evacuated 4,000 Iranian fighters from the Hmeimim base to Tehran. Some Iranian-aligned units, avoiding direct engagement, relocated to Lebanon, while others moved to Iraq.”

Since the onset of a new phase of developments in Syria and Assad’s departure to Russia, multiple Iranian officials—including the foreign minister, the foreign ministry spokesperson, and Iran’s ambassador to Syria—have addressed the situation through various television programs and press conferences.

They discussed the events leading up to the collapse of Assad’s government in the weeks and days preceding his departure. However, Putin’s remarks during his annual press conference introduced new details that had not been previously disclosed.

Reflecting on the long-standing cooperation and coordination between Iran and Russia in their joint fight against terrorism in Syria, Baghaei noted, “It is not unusual for parties involved in Syria’s developments to present their own narratives about the causes and actors behind these events.”

“However, it seems that some of the comments made regarding Iran’s advisory role in Syria during the final days leading to Damascus’s fall may not have been based on precise information,” he added.

He reiterated that Iran’s advisory presence in Syria was initially aimed at supporting the Syrian army, combating terrorism, and preventing insecurity from spreading to neighboring areas and the broader region.

According to Baghaei, the decision to withdraw advisory forces was also a “responsible move,” considering the prevailing conditions in Syria and the region.

‘Iran’s presence in Syria changed after fall of Daesh’

Baghaei highlighted that Iran entered Syria at the invitation of its legitimate government, stating, “Iran and Syria have had effective cooperation over the years in combating terrorism, successfully preventing the dangerous spread of Daesh in Syria and Iraq, as well as curbing terrorism in the region.”

He also explained, “Following the fall of Daesh, Iran’s military presence on Syria’s defensive lines shifted. It became limited to providing advisory assistance aimed at preventing the resurgence of Daesh and Takfiri terrorism while strengthening Syria’s military capabilities against the Zionist regime’s provocations.”

He stated that this approach proved successful. As witnessed, immediately after the withdrawal of Iranian advisory forces, the occupying regime seized strategic parts of Syrian territory and destroyed critical defensive infrastructure in the country.

Iran prefers official channels for dialogue with Russia: Spox

Baghaei also pointed to Iranian nationals evacuated from Syria. “These individuals included the families of diplomats, staff from Iran’s diplomatic, consular, and cultural missions in Syria, Iranian pilgrims, some non-Iranian pilgrims, and others who had traveled to Syria to assist Lebanese refugees.”

The diplomat also noted that all Iranian nationals were evacuated to Iran using Iranian aircraft via the Hmeimim airbase, which, in coordination with Russia, was consistently used as a supplementary airport alongside Damascus International Airport.

The spokesperson also emphasized that Iran and Russia maintain significant relations across various fields, with continuous dialogue taking place at multiple levels, saying, “We prefer that the exchange of views and experiences occurs through official channels.”

Iran envoy condoles loss of security forces in Pakistan

In a post on his X account on Sunday, Reza Amiri-Moghaddam reacted to the martyrdom of 16 Pakistani security forces and wrote, “I was saddened to hear the news of the martyrdom of 16 Pakistani security forces in a terrorist attack in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.”

“I offer my heartfelt condolences to the government, army, and noble people of Pakistan, especially the families who lost their loved ones. I pray to God Almighty to grant the martyrs the highest ranks and to grant patience and forbearance to the bereaved families,” he added.

Pakistani Taliban claimed a brazen overnight raid on an army outpost near the border with Afghanistan on Saturday, which intelligence officials said killed 16 soldiers and critically wounded five more.

The siege started after midnight and lasted about two hours as around 30 terrorists pummeled the mountainous outpost from three sides, one senior intelligence official told AFP on condition of anonymity.

MA/6324010

Armenia ready to develop nuclear coop. with Russia

Grigoryan made this statement at the 23rd meeting of the Intergovernmental Commission on Economic Cooperation between Armenia and Russia, held in Moscow on December 19,” Armenpress reported.

In this context, the issue of launching the second power unit of the Armenian NPP in 2026 and extending its operation until 2036 is a priority for Armenia,” the Deputy PM said.”I would like to express our readiness to develop cooperation with Russia in the field of the peaceful use of atomic energy.

In this context, I consider the signing of a declaration on strategic partnership in the field of nuclear medicine to be important,” Grigoryan noted.

Touching upon the issue of external energy supplies, the Deputy Prime Minister of Armenia mentioned that the volume of gasoline imports from Russia to Armenia during the first 11 months of the current year amounted to 145 thousand tons, diesel fuel to 139 thousand tons, and natural gas to 1.9 billion cubic meters.

SD/

Seven Indians among injured in German market attack

Our Mission is in contact with Indians who are injured, as well as their families, and rendering all possible assistance,” the MEA said

Updated On – 22 December 2024, 05:06 AM


Seven Indians among injured in German market attack

Police Officers Stand At A Cordoned Off Christmas Market

New Delhi: Seven Indians have been injured in the deadly car-ramming attack in the eastern German city of Magdeburg and the Indian embassy in Berlin is providing them all possible assistance, official sources said on Saturday night.

A 50-year-old man drove his car into crowds at a Christmas market on Friday evening in Saxony-Anhalt state’s Magdeburg, leaving at least five people, including a nine-year-old, dead and nearly 200 injured, according to German authorities.


Three out of seven injured Indians have been discharged from hospital, the Indian government sources said.

Condemning the “horrific and senseless” attack, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said the Indian mission in Germany is in contact with the Indians injured. It, however, did not specify the number of Indians injured.

In a post on X, the Indian embassy in Berlin said it is maintaining close contact with the Indians injured in the attack.

In a statement, the MEA said the Indian mission is rendering all possible assistance to the Indians injured in the incident.

“We condemn the horrific and senseless attack at a Christmas market in Magdeburg, Germany,” the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said. “Several precious lives have been lost and many have been injured. Our thoughts and prayers are with the victims.”

“Our Mission is in contact with Indians who are injured, as well as their families, and rendering all possible assistance,” the MEA said in a statement.

Local law enforcement authorities said the 50-year-old man, who drove the car into the crowd, has been arrested.

The man reportedly hails from Saudi Arabia and he has been living in Germany since 2006.

Senior prosecutor Horst Walter Nopens said the motive for the attack remains unclear, but the suspect’s dissatisfaction with Germany’s treatment of Saudi refugees may have played a role, according to German Broadcaster Deutsche Welle.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Interior Minister Nancy Faeser visited Magdeburg on Saturday.

Scandalous detention of Iranians by US to extort information

Two Iranian nationals have been recently arrested in the United States and Italy on allegations of involvement in equipping drones allegedly used in attacks on American forces—a claim Iran has strongly rejected as baseless.

On the evening of December 16, Mohammad Abedini Najafabadi, 38, a mechanical engineering graduate from Sharif University of Technology, was detained by Italian police at Milan Airport while preparing to travel to Switzerland. The arrest, carried out at the request of the United States, has cut off all direct contact with him.

Meanwhile, Mahdi Mohammadsadeghi, 42, a US resident, was arrested in Massachusetts around the same time.

According to reports, the arrests of the two individuals are allegedly linked to a January 28 drone attack carried out by Iraqi armed groups against a US military outpost in Jordan known as Tower 22.

The attack killed three American soldiers and injured 47 others. The FBI claims that the equipment used in the drone attack was supplied by these two individuals.

A university peer of Mohammad Abedini told Tasnim News Agency that Abedini is an Iranian national and the CEO of Sanat Danesh Rahpooyan Aflak (SDRA), a company in Iran specializing in precision measurement equipment.

The company’s products have diverse applications, including medical and sports technologies.

Abedini also headed a Swiss-based company, Illumove SA, which focused on motion capture equipment manufacturing. All activities of these companies were conducted under the legal and financial oversight of the Swiss government.

The unnamed source explained that due to their advanced technology, the equipment produced by these companies has multipurpose uses. Once legally sold in Iranian markets, the products can be purchased and utilized by any individual or entity.

However, the US government has fabricated charges, claiming the equipment was used in drones involved in the aforementioned attack, leading to the arrest and prosecution of these individuals.

He emphasized that the lack of formal communication with the Iranian embassy and the denial of access to Abedini constitutes a clear case of abduction.

“Even if the allegations were proven, the appropriate course of action would have been to prevent his entry into Europe or the United States, not to detain him based on unsubstantiated claims,” he said.

Since two days ago, Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, through its consulate in Italy, has launched extensive efforts to secure Mohammad Abedini’s release or at least obtain information about his condition. It is hoped that these efforts will yield results before any judicial action is taken against him.