In court on Thursday, Trump appeared relatively subdued compared to his appearances last week.
Published Date – 25 January 2024, 10:52 PM
New York: Former President Donald Trump‘s lawyers were poised to begin his defence, including calling him as a witness on Thursday, to fight a lawsuit seeking over USD 10 million for things he said about advice columnist E. Jean Carroll after she accused him of sexual assault.
Trump was expected to testify after Carroll’s lawyers finished the presentation of their case by showing jurors video clips of the Republican front-runner in this year’s presidential race saying at a January 17 campaign rally that Carroll’s claims were a “made-up, fabricated story” and a 2022 deposition deriding her as “a liar and a very sick person.”
Trump attorney Alina Habba asked for a directed verdict in Trump’s favour, saying that it was clear from Carroll’s testimony that there was insufficient proof to allow the jury to find damages. “Your honour, Ms. Carroll didn’t prove her case, period,” she said. Judge Lewis A. Kaplan denied the request.
The Manhattan federal court trial had been suspended since early Monday because of a juror’s illness. When it resumed on Thursday, the judge said two jurors were being “socially distanced” from the others in the jury box.
Prior to resting, Carroll’s lawyers called a single witness — Roberta Myers — who testified that Carroll was a “truthteller,” an accomplished writer with a long history of unleashing a “tremendous amount of empathy and a great sense of humour” in her popular monthly advice column while Myers was editor-in-chief of Elle magazine from 2000 to 2017.
It was after her testimony that Carroll’s attorneys showed the video clips, including portions of Trump’s October 2022 deposition when he denied knowing who Carroll was. One snippet shown to jurors was when Trump during his deposition misidentified Carroll as his ex-wife, Marla Maples. If everything goes as planned, Trump could be on the witness stand before the end of the day.
Habba told the judge the first defense witness will not be Trump. He is fresh off big victories in the New Hampshire primary on Tuesday and the Iowa caucuses last week.
In court on Thursday, Trump appeared relatively subdued compared to his appearances last week. He mostly gazed straight ahead, expressionless, though he seemed to move his lips along with the movement of his mouth in the video showing him saying the trial was rigged.
Carroll, 80, testified at a trial last year in the same courtroom that she was attacked by Trump in the dressing room of a midtown luxury department store in spring 1996. A jury last year agreed that it happened and awarded Carroll USD 5 million in damages for sexual abuse and defamation. Trump denies ever knowing Carroll and says she made up her claims to sell a memoir.
He did not testify or attend last year’s trial, a decision he now says he regrets. Kaplan ruled that last year’s jury conclusions meant that a new jury chosen last week only needs to decide how much more money, if any, Trump owes Carroll for disparaging her and calling her a liar in 2019 while he was president. Thus, Kaplan has ruled, Trump will be barred from testifying about subjects that would conflict with last year’s verdict.
He will not, for instance, be permitted to say she made up her sexual assault claims or that she was motivated by her book deal or for political reasons. Trump, 77, attended the trial two of three days last week and let the jury know — through muttered comments and gestures like shaking his head — that he was disgusted with the case against him. Trump has already tested the judge’s patience.
After he complained to his lawyers about a “witch hunt” and a “con job” within earshot of jurors, Kaplan threatened to eject him from the courtroom if it happened again.
“I would love it,” Trump said. Later that day, Trump told a news conference Kaplan was a “nasty judge” and that Carroll’s allegation was “a made-up, fabricated story.”
When not in court, he has repeatedly made pronouncements on his social network similar to statements at stake in the trial. Carroll’s attorneys have put some of those statements before the jury, arguing that the only way to stop Trump from defaming Carroll is to hit him in a big way financially.
Trump’s attorneys have tried to show the jury through their cross-examination of witnesses that Carroll has gained a measure of fame and financial rewards through taking on Trump that outweigh the death threats and other venom slung at her through social media.
Habba has told the judge that he might testify because, even with the judge’s restrictions, “he can still offer considerable testimony in his defence.” Among other things, he can testify about his state of mind when he made the statements that got him sued and about how his comments came as Carroll was doing media interviews and journalists were asking him about her, Habba wrote.
She also suggested he could “show his lack of ill will or spite” by talking about how he “corrected” his initial denial of having ever met Carroll.
The current trial is in addition to four criminal cases Trump faces as the presidential primary season heats up. He has been juggling court and campaign appearances, using both to argue that he’s being persecuted by Democrats terrified of his possible election.
